Net Zero is BS because it doesn't require any meaningful reduction in emissions. The fact that it has full backing by every big corporation/oligarch says everything.
Buying up hundreds of hectares in Tanzania and planting forest monocultures to "offset" emissions is not changing anything. I don't have the link, but it's estimated that 95%-85% of "offsets" fail in their offset goals each year.
100% agree. This report is directionally correct - costs will be much higher than the govt/ CCC/ net zero advocates tell us - but that calculation is a howler that discredits everything!
Net Zero is BS because it doesn't require any meaningful reduction in emissions. The fact that it has full backing by every big corporation/oligarch says everything.
Buying up hundreds of hectares in Tanzania and planting forest monocultures to "offset" emissions is not changing anything. I don't have the link, but it's estimated that 95%-85% of "offsets" fail in their offset goals each year.
100% agree. This report is directionally correct - costs will be much higher than the govt/ CCC/ net zero advocates tell us - but that calculation is a howler that discredits everything!